update pplpy to 0.8.7 - to make gcc 12.2.1 happy #35290
Conversation
|
oops, by mistake I pushed here rather than to my fork. I'll remove the branch once this is merged, sorry for the mess. |
|
for some reason, the pypi 0.8.7 never made it to Sage. But it's apparently needed for gcc 12.2.1 |
|
Documentation preview for this PR is ready! 🎉 |
Codecov ReportPatch coverage has no change and project coverage change:
Additional details and impacted files@@ Coverage Diff @@
## develop #35290 +/- ##
===========================================
- Coverage 88.62% 88.60% -0.02%
===========================================
Files 2148 2148
Lines 398653 398653
===========================================
- Hits 353308 353246 -62
- Misses 45345 45407 +62 see 27 files with indirect coverage changes Help us with your feedback. Take ten seconds to tell us how you rate us. Have a feature suggestion? Share it here. ☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry. |
|
the test failure is unrelated, and reported here #35292 (a lucky random seed triggered a bug elsewhere) |
### 📚 system pkgs info and GH actions for alpine linux Will fix #33083. This is the rebase of the branch of the latter on top of 10.0.beta4, reduced to the scripts and package lists. Workarounds for musl libc from #33083 will be revisited in a follow up. ### 📝 Checklist - [X] I have made sure that the title is self-explanatory and the description concisely explains the PR. - [X] I have linked an issue or discussion. - [ ] I have created tests covering the changes. - [ ] I have updated the documentation accordingly. ### Dependencies - #35290 - pplpy 0.8.7 - #35094 - saner libsingular linking URL: #35285 Reported by: Dima Pasechnik Reviewer(s): Dima Pasechnik, Matthias Köppe
📚 Description update pplpy to 0.8.7
with 0.8.6, gcc 12.2.1 complains, see #35285 (comment)
📝 Checklist